Category Archives: essays by todd moore

reading the dark

Todd Moore | Photo: Pete Jonsson

READING THE DARK 

Maybe it’s the way the light hits the page. Or maybe it’s the way that the light gets mixed in with the dark of the page. Or maybe it’s the mysteriously rich darkness itself before it washes over the words. But, it’s something that just misses being explained about the dark mystery of reading aloud in the night. Reading so that the voice collides with the night. The voice and the night. Maybe it’s something about reading a poem, or a particular kind of novel, or a short story in the semi dark, the half dark, the dream dark. A darkened room where it’s just light enough to read a book and just dark enough to feel the way those words can crowd into your dreams.

And, it really has nothing to do with ghost stories, though I wish I had been there the night that Byron, Shelley, and his wife started telling each other ghost stories and Mary Shelley met Frankenstein for the first time in some dark corner of that room. Ghost stories are so easy to read silently or aloud in the dark but this isn’t about ghost stories. This is about something else, something about the origins of the primal darkness in the human voice, something about the scratched skin origins of the act of reading. Of tearing the words straight off the text with the mouth and eating them with the sounding of the voice. Tearing them apart in a ritual of chew and spraytalking them out to someone else. Some dark other.

Imagine a prehistoric storyteller talking about killing the first wolf. And, he’s speaking in the half dark. And, there is a fire. You can hear the wood still crackling in the heat And by the time the hunter gets around to talking the fire may have burned down so that only the raw embers of the wood are igniting the night. And, he begins to tell about how he met up with the first huge wolf. Or, maybe it really wasn’t the first wolf but it was his first huge wolf. And, he describes how he stalked this animal. How he tried to breathe like that wolf. How he tried to see like that wolf. How he tried to dream like that wolf. And, then the kill instant, the spear, the stink of the first wolf blood, the snarling sound of the wolf while it dies, eating the sound of itself, eating all of its fury. And, when it finally takes its last breath, the hunter holds his hand over the wolf’s body and feels its spirit fly up out of its fur. Fly up so violently that it feels as though the hunter is holding his hand over a fire.

When I say read, I mean something that comes close to a poetry reading. Something just this side of acting, just the other side of dreaming, something related to a peculiar ritual of the self listening to what it sounds like. Pure theater, the self’s attempt to empty the talk out of itself. When I say read, I am referring to the way that words jump into the mouth from the printed page. When I say read I am talking about the way that the reader wrestles the spoken word as though it were the angel of death and the resurrection horribly and beautifully twisted into each other. When I say read, I mean the first time Homer recited the beginning lines of the ILIAD. When I say read, I am trying to conjure the way those first syllables flew out of the psyche and then back again. When I say read, I am talking beyond the talking of the Alpha and Omega of the poem, the death struggle for all the words and the lines to stay together in the resonances and dream vibrations merging and pouring out of the human voice.

When I finished writing THE NAME IS DILLINGER, I waited for the night when the house would be empty for an hour or so. And when no one was there, I turned all the lights off except for one small lamp which I set on the floor and then I sat down with the typed pages of the poem sprawled in my lap. It was the kind of night where the darkness was impenetrable. If there were any shadows they were so thick with darkness they couldn’t be entered. Or, escaped from. That darkness had become the worm hole of the poem. A place to spiral into with love and horror.

I sat quietly for several minutes waiting for my eyes to adjust to the soft glow coming from the lamp. But that wasn’t all I was waiting for. I was also waiting for the voice way back inside my voice. The secret voice, the spectral voice, the voice of the other which lives shoved down, stomped down, packed down, slammed down, punched down inside my own public voice. I was waiting to see if that night voice would come out and let itself be heard. Let itself dance into and through the aura and the ecstasy of the poem. And, when it did I could feel the all the textures of the night that lived there, that dreamt there.

Imagine reading HOWL this way. Taking your time so that all the separate little desperate howls enter that one enormous shaking black street HOWL. I wonder if Ginsberg had ever tried doing something like this. Though I think he came close when he read it at Six Gallery. Imagine reading THE WASTE LAND this way. Eliot may have been too proper to try something like this. Because reading in this kind of half dark night clotted light may have been too sexual, too frightening for him. Still, listening to that old recording of Eliot read THE WASTELAND makes me want to pretend he is reading it in the dark. Despite the prissy sound of Eliot’s fake English accent, there is something so dark in that reading, something so haunted, so eerie and mesmeric it sends out particles of darkness.

Some poetry is haunted and especially suited for the dark reading, the night chant, the midnight performance. Not because it is openly occult but because it is possessed with a certain kind of night energy. A Maria Sabina energy. An Orpingalik energy. A Black Elk energy. The energy of shape shifters and nightwalkers and poet conjurors. Primitive poets snatching the first word right out of the air. Some poetry is so haunted, it can possess you at noon as well as at midnight. A SEASON IN HELL could do that. FLOWERS OF EVIL could do that. THE DREAM SONGS could do that. LUMINOUS ANIMAL could do that. ARIEL could do that. THE CORPSE IS DREAMING could do that.

In Las Vegas, New Mexico, I watched Tony Moffeit conjure the lightning at the Super Chief Café. Little sparks played off his hand while he worked that drum. And, I could hear the night crack in half while he began to chant.

Some poetry is haunted line, word, and voice. The page hypnotizes, the speaking voice seduces. Some poetry is so electrically charged it can light fires, it can burn your eyes, it can scorch your soul down to the last essence of its night music. Why do you think that Voodoo is practiced in the archetypal dark with only the bonfires going? Why do you think that Lorca’s Duende is made of the black stuff, the night energy? HAMLET is a play best performed in the murderous evening. THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV was mostly written in the unforgiving night. MOBY DICK is the night heart of a black hole america. DILLINGER is the shaved moon and the gray wolf howling. Death maps the dark better than anyone. Catch and wrestle him for the poem.

When I finished the very last section of DILLINGER called The Night Corpse, I dreamt I read it to a wall of darkness. But, it was a strange kind of darkness because along the wall there were pockets of light and those pockets of light exposed strange alphabets I couldn’t decipher, but while I read the poem I had the distinct feeling these mysterious alphabets were deciphering me.

Almost anyone can read poetry in the dark but there are only a handful of poets in any generation who could pull off a night reading. I am almost certain Poe could have done it. Without a doubt, Lorca would have been superb at it. Burroughs reading NAKED LUNCH would have been hypnotic. And, Bukowski alternatively reading and heckling his audience was both vulnerable and the best of night demons. As for living poets Moffeit is a natural, John Macker dressed in black reading from ADVENTURES IN THE GUNTRADE would almost certainly shapeshift into his outlaw self, Kell Robertson has that ragged darkness absolutely necessary for a night reading, and lets not forget Dennis Gulling, and Mark Weber and S. A. Griffin. I’d love to see Cormac McCarthy read the massacre sections of BLOOD MERIDIAN in the subversive dark.

The night reading is the quirkiest kind of public reading. It is the most haunted form of reading that I know. It requires a dark energy summoned from the poet’s psyche. It is a wager made against oblivion and all the poet’s demons. It is a dance, it is a game, it is a ritual, it is a dying. And, it is a poem written in blood with a bone.

Todd Moore | October 30, 2007

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under essays by todd moore

the last good reading from the outlaw dark

Todd Moore | Photo: Raindog aka R.D.Armstrong

Todd Moore | Photo: Raindog aka R.D.Armstrong

All primal poetry begins somewhere outside the limits of acceptable human behavior. All primal poetry begins in ecstasy or in violence or in knowledge of blood and death. All primal poetry emerges from the caves and the weeds and the canyons and the rivers. All primal poetry is by its very nature Outlaw Poetry because it evokes all of those feelings that most of us spend so much time avoiding or masking or denying. All primal poetry which is also absolutely Outlaw poetry is the stuff of grave trash, treasure, passion, and dreams. All primal poetry is lightninged back into itself and because it is filled with so much electricity it is deflected back into the world as the printed word. But, if you know anything about poetry at all, you know the primal stuff, the Outlaw stuff is so hot it could burn your hands off at the slightest touch.

The passage of several thousand years has not changed the essential nature of poetry. Whitman and Lorca, Hart Crane and Rimbaud, Bukowski and Burroughs are proof enough of that. The essential nature of Outlaw Poetry is both sophistication and savagery. It is easy to find sophistication in contemporary poetry. Pick up any copy of The American Poetry Review or Poetry Magazine and turn to the first poem that comes to hand. What you will find most of the time is a hothouse poem, a poem that looks fat like a supermarket tomato with all of the texture and wildness bred out of it, a poem where you might find allusions to Heidegger, Musil, Borges, and Poe but when you finish reading the piece, the only feeling you will have is a kind of enlightened boredom, maybe a feeling of having been cheated for bothering to read the poem at all, or at best a kind of murderous ennui, a lunging desire for something more, something with some blood and risk in it, a poem that somehow reaches straight down through your skull, behind your eyes, and into the very heart of you and threatens to pull all of you out, yank it free like some kind of psychic scalping. That’s what’s missing in most mainstream and academic poetry being published today. The only place where you can find both sophistication and savagery is in Outlaw Poetry. Especially savagery.

The kind of savagery you might find in Jack Micheline, Tony Scibella, David Lerner, Lorrie Jackson, Ray Bremser, and d. a. levy. The kind of savagery Ed Dorn knew all about in GUNSLINGER. The kind of savagery also found in the poems of Kell Robertson, Tony Moffeit, Mark Weber, Dennis Gulling, S. A. Griffin, John Macker, Ron Androla, Raindog Armstrong, Joe Pachinko, Gary Goude. And, in the next generation of Outlaws, the work of Glenn Cooper, Tim Wells, Christopher Robin, Misti Rainwater-Lites, Theron Moore, Doug Draime, William Taylor Jr., Scott Wannberg, John Dorsey, Dave Roskos, Lawrence Welsh, Justin Hyde. (I know I am forgetting some names. But, I will remember them. I am a forest of outlaws and a jungle of names.)

When I say savagery, what I am referring to is the kind of raw poetry that is bloody glorious in all of its oozing rawness. Raw in the extreme with all of its nerves exposed and jumping. Raw in the way that it bleeds its violences and its passions and its visions and its nightmares. Raw in the way that this kind of poem hooks you and drags you into its vortex. Primeval raw and big city raw and frontier raw and redneck raw. Nothing is excluded except tameness. Nothing is left out except being politically correct. Maybe it’s time to kick Politically Correctness’ ass. And, with that in mind, the furnace door has been thrown wide open and the outlaw poet is getting all set to throw the torn off lid to Pandora’s box into the outrageous flames.

Outlaw Poetry demands nothing less than something like that. Outlaw Poetry is the thumb pressed against the jugular of polite poetry, poetry that longs to be loved. Outlaw Poetry is a length of piano wire stretched across the throat of academic poetry. Outlaw Poetry is conjuring Lorca back to life so he can assassinate Franco and then Franco and then Franco again. Outlaw Poetry is the pure speed and visceral excitement of the poem on the page. Rev that sumbitch. Pare it down, skin it down, hone it down, shoot the motherfucking poem to pieces if you have to to make it new. Blow it all to hell and start over with another alphabet if you have to.

Because, we have reached the death trench where all language is being dumped even as we dream the exquisite dream. We have reached the abyss of stupid talking and kiss ass poetry. We have reached the black hole of stanza and line. The endpoint. All writing is whispering against breakdown and holocaust. All poetry either means blood and passion and murder and dreams or it’s just stuttering and spitting blood in the wake of entropy and darkness and we’ve had more than enough of that. The wind bears our silences down the street with all the blown trash.

The only poetry that matters now is the primal stuff, the Outlaw stuff, the kind of poem composed somewhere between the pistol flash and the last wet breath. Here’s the acid test. Try reading John Ashbery, Donald Hall, or Robert Pinsky in the dark, or for that matter any academic, any sainted university cow. Just have one small lamp burning. Make it just enough to read by so that you can see where the light blurs into the darkness. And, start in, and see how long it takes you to be bored out of your loving and chaotic mind. See how long it takes you to realize that the big fight is between poetry and the darkness, the big fight is between poetry and death and that all poets read against the darkness even though they may be performing at noon. And, every reading is the last good reading from the Outlaw dark.

Now, by the same token, under the same conditions, start reading HOWL, THE NORTH ATLANTIC BOOK OF THE DEAD, BOOGIE ALLEY, ADVENTURES IN THE GUNTRADE, A HORSE CALLED DESPERATION, BURNING IN WATER DROWNING IN FLAME, NUMBSKULL SUTRA, or DILLINGER and see what happens. Listen to the way the mojo works both voice and poem. Listen to the way that the poem takes both the reader and the listener hostage and if the listener is simply the darkness, then for a little while the poem wins against oblivion. Only powerful poetry can survive the small lamp burning and the singular voice conjuring magic in the dark.

We know by now that all of the old strategies no longer work. They function, yes, but they really don’t mean anything to the poet who waits tables in the local diner, the bartender poet, the cabbie poet. I’m talking about the workshop, the writing degree, the good old boy prize system, the blurb tapdance purchased by money or favors or both, the poetry foundation ripe with stupid money which is capable of buying almost anything, and the lardass poem which lumbers across the page like an overweight penguin. It’s time to throw all this shit out the window with the rest of the slop and discover the poem once more for the first time. And, if this old fucked up world has only a few beats and breaths left, maybe the Outlaws can somehow make those breaths authentic again.

 

 

1 Comment

Filed under essays by todd moore